I'm
not sure which Star Trek captain we need most in today's society,
only that the leader needs to show an intelligent and compassionate
approach to the problems that he or she is faced with. In one of the
episodes (“Dear Doctor”, Star Trek: Enterprise) that I watched,
Captain Archer insists on giving Dr. Phlox enough time to find a
cure, or at least a path toward a cure, for the fatal illness faced
by the Valakians on their planet, which was being visited by
Enterprise. Even though the doctor doesn't believe that he should
interfere with the serious problems faced by the Valakians, he and
the captain are able to reach a compromise while acknowledging
conflicting views which need to be dealt with. This ability to
understand the other person's viewpoint is sorely needed in today's
world.
As
for Discovery's take on not focusing on the captain in season 1, I
came to observe that some episodes put more emphasis on the opinion
of the captain than others. In the episode, “Into the Forest I Go”,
the captain is present, and has a certain point of view about the
mission central to the story, but his crew members have other
approaches to the problems that they face. This occurs to some degree
in most of the episodes that I have watched – think Captain Kirk
and Spock in the original series, for instance. I think that, if
anything, the different approaches to the centrality of the captain,
shown in this lesson, and others, caused me to think more carefully
about the interactions between him, or her, and the crew.